Storytelling & Business Communication speakers
Speakers who use narrative to make complex ideas land with clarity, emotion and lasting commercial impact
Speakers Associates represents 447 speakers on Storytelling & Business Communication, including Arnt Eriksen, Mark Stevenson, Purna Virji, Lucy Bullivant, Jennifer Willey, Lauren Ducrey, Shela Gobertina von Trapp, Neelu Kaur, James Haskell and Shil Shanghavi.
Boards and senior teams operating in Britain are making capital and workforce decisions inside a political system most of them no longer trust to be stable. Westminster’s signals on tax, regulation, welfare and public spending shift faster than any planning cycle, and the commentary around them is noisier and more partisan than it has ever been. Leaders need someone who can read the politics honestly, separate the durable shifts from the noise, and do it in front of an audience that includes sceptics.
Creative output is the most unmanageable input most organisations rely on. Brand teams, product groups and content functions are asked to produce cultural relevance on demand, and the people inside them often cannot say why a given idea worked or how to repeat it. The gap between “we need a moment” and the practical craft of building one is where most marketing budgets quietly disappear.
Most commercial teams are not losing to better products. They are losing to better sellers, and to rivals who have learned to build a personal brand that opens doors before a pitch begins. Leaders want their salespeople, founders, and client-facing executives to act like owners of the relationship, not order-takers, yet sales culture in most organisations still rewards process over presence. The problem is not motivation. It is a missing operating model for how individuals actually win trust, attention, and the close in markets where every competitor looks credible on paper.
Most corporate net zero commitments rest on carbon credit purchases that regulators, investors, and civil society are now actively interrogating. The question boards face is not whether to act on climate, but which actions will hold under scrutiny. Carbon removal sits at the centre of that tension – scientifically necessary, commercially immature, and poorly understood by the people being asked to fund it.
A live event lives or dies on the person holding the room. When a senior audience is in front of a panel of regional leaders, advertisers or transformation executives, the quality of the chair decides whether the conversation stays sharp or slides into safe generalities. Organisations need a host who can keep the agenda moving, push panellists for a real answer, and make the room feel the stakes of what is being discussed.
Boards are being asked to price risks that their models were never built to carry: constitutional drift in the UK, a volatile US political cycle, and the steady erosion of shared facts in public debate. The temptation is to treat each as a one-off event. The harder task is reading them as a connected pattern and deciding what it means for strategy, reputation and exposure in the next three years.
Senior leaders now sit on stages and in boardrooms where the questions cross monetary policy, sanctions, energy, and political risk in the same hour. Most chairs cannot hold that ground without losing the audience or the speakers. The right moderator pulls a precise answer from a central bank governor, then turns to a CFO without breaking the line of argument.
Leaders are trained to deliver results but rarely to handle the moment a conversation turns adversarial. When pressure rises, most default to control or avoidance, and the real issue stays buried until it damages trust or performance. The hardest leadership problems are emotional before they are strategic, and few leaders have a reliable method for the emotional part.
Most leaders now agree that AI will reshape their workforce. Fewer can say what that looks like on a Monday morning for a marketing coordinator, a finance analyst or a field engineer. The distance between boardroom AI strategy and the person being asked to use the tools is where adoption stalls, budgets leak and cultural resistance hardens.
Mental health pressure inside organisations is now a senior leadership problem, not a wellness programme. High performers carry it quietly, executives mask it, and the cost shows up in turnover, presenteeism, and avoidable burnout. The harder question is how to talk about it credibly without lapsing into wellness theatre or HR boilerplate.
Senior leaders are being asked to hold their nerve in situations their training did not prepare them for: compressed decisions, hostile audiences, physical and reputational risk running at the same time. Composure under that load is not a personality trait. It is a set of habits around attention, communication and trust that can be taught by people who have had to use them.
Senior leaders are being asked to talk openly about mental health while still performing under unrelenting pressure. The vocabulary is everywhere; credible voices, particularly for men, are rare. Audiences want someone who has lived the question of how a person stays whole through sustained adversity, and can say something useful about it without slipping into clinical language or wellness cliché.