Emotionell intelligens
Talare som utforskar hur självmedvetenhet och empati formar bättre ledare, team och organisationer
Speakers Associates represents 77 speakers on Emotionell intelligens, including Joy Poole, Lauren Ducrey, Gopi Krishnaswamy, Neelu Kaur, Martin Brooks, Nikki Bhamra, Kit Symons & Holly Sedlacek, Paul McGee, Scott Tillema och Mc’Dole Chigborogu.
Wellbeing programmes increasingly skim the surface of what is actually breaking people at work. Stress, burnout and disengagement often sit on top of harder questions about food, body image and self-worth that almost no organisation is equipped to address. Without a credible clinical voice, wellbeing strategy stays at the perks layer and leaves the underlying drivers of absence, presenteeism and attrition untouched.
People-pleasing and imposter syndrome are widely named in workplaces, rarely treated as the operational drag they are. They show up as missed boundaries, unspoken disagreement in meetings, talent quietly under-performing, and senior staff burning out without explaining why. Most wellbeing programmes label the problem; few give people the clinical vocabulary to change it.
Senior leaders are now expected to perform under pressure continuously rather than in occasional bursts. Most have trained every capability except the one that decides whether they last: how they hold attention and composure when the load never lets up. Left to chance, that inner capacity gives way, and the cost shows up as eroded judgement and quiet burnout at the top.
Workforces are running on depleted batteries. Engagement scores fall, attrition climbs, and the people most relied on are the most fatigued. Conventional wellness programmes do not move the dial because they treat symptoms while the underlying load on attention, recovery, and emotional regulation continues to grow.
Workforces are exhausted, disengaged, and increasingly cynical about culture programmes that promise change and deliver slogans. Leaders know engagement scores, attrition, and incivility are connected to commercial performance, but most interventions sit at the level of policy rather than behaviour. The gap between stated culture and lived experience is now a measurable cost on the P&L.
Most organisations underperform not because their people lack ideas, but because they will not ask for the meeting, the budget, the deal, or the promotion. Fear of rejection is the single most reliable brake on sales conversion, internal mobility, and innovation pipelines. Training rarely addresses it directly, because the skill being trained is emotional, not technical.
Leaders promoted for their expertise are often underprepared for the experience of leading under sustained pressure. When the situation is uncertain, the decision picture is incomplete, and the team is watching, personal composure becomes a strategic variable, not a soft skill. Most organisations invest heavily in external change capability while leaving the internal mechanics of leadership under pressure almost entirely unaddressed.
Most leadership teams handle the easy 92 percent of any difficult conversation, then stop short of what actually matters. Feedback gets softened, decisions get postponed, and risks the gut already flagged go untaken. The cost shows up later as stalled change programmes, weak accountability, and capable people who quietly disengage.
Wellbeing budgets keep growing while engagement, burnout and attrition numbers refuse to move. Most programmes treat the symptoms of stress rather than the underlying psychology that drives how people behave under pressure at work. Leaders need a way to give staff practical tools for self-regulation and emotional intelligence that hold up beyond the away-day.
Most people carry the weight of their personal lives into the working day, and many carry real adversity that standard wellbeing programmes never reach. The science of how the brain shapes behaviour, in children and in adults, is the most practical lens organisations have for this. It supports working parents and helps employees rebuild after difficulty rather than mask it.
Senior teams can be technically sharp and still underperform in the moments that matter. Pressure exposes the gap between how leaders think they behave and how they actually show up, and between a team that tolerates each other and one that trusts each other. Most development programmes rehearse models; few build the emotional range a leader needs when the plan breaks.
Employees are told AI will augment them, and quietly conclude it will replace them. The doubt surfaces as disengagement: quieter meetings, and less of the judgement that made people worth hiring in the first place. Most AI rollouts hand a workforce new tools without giving anyone language for what remains theirs.