Geschichtenerzählen & Geschäftskommunikation
Redner, die durch Narratives komplexe Ideen mit Klarheit, Emotion und nachhaltiger geschäftlicher Wirkung vermitteln
Speakers Associates represents 446 speakers on Geschichtenerzählen & Geschäftskommunikation, including Arnt Eriksen, Mark Stevenson, Purna Virji, Lucy Bullivant, Jennifer Willey, Shela Gobertina von Trapp, Neelu Kaur, James Haskell, Shil Shanghavi und Professor Maja.
Teams hit a point where communication breaks down, change fatigue sets in, and ownership thins out. Leaders can name the symptoms, lower engagement scores, slower adoption of new ways of working, weaker connection in hybrid setups, without changing the everyday behaviours that drive them. The work is to shift how people relate, communicate, and respond to pressure before the culture calcifies around the wrong defaults.
Senior teams know what good decision-making looks like in stable conditions. They are less sure what it looks like when information is thin, the environment is hostile, and pulling back is not an option. That gap, between planned leadership and leadership under genuine pressure, is where composure, judgement, and trust in a small team stop being abstract and start being measurable.
Boards and executive teams are trying to read political risk in real time, on issues that move faster than briefing notes can keep up with. UK policy, Westminster instability, geopolitical shocks and election cycles now feed directly into capital allocation, supply chain and reputational decisions. Leaders need a clear, non-partisan read of what is actually happening in government and what it means for their organisation.
Purpose-driven business is now a crowded marketing category, and most of it rings hollow. Customers and employees can tell when a giving programme is bolted onto an unchanged commercial model. The harder question is whether giving can be the engine itself, and what happens to the founder when the model is tested at scale.
The organisations that treat Africa as a risk geography rather than an investment landscape are misreading a structural shift that is already underway. Boards are poorly equipped to integrate development economics, sovereign debt, political risk, and ESG commitments into a single commercial position. The gap between aid-era assumptions about the continent and the realities of its investable markets is larger than most leadership teams have acknowledged.
Political decisions made in Washington now move markets, rewrite supply chains and reshape alliances within a single news cycle. Boards and executive teams are being asked to read presidential intent, congressional risk and foreign policy direction in real time, with access to the same cable coverage as everyone else. What they lack is a primary-source account of how those decisions are actually being made, by whom, and on what evidence.
Most organisations now ask employees to build trust, influence and visibility across digital channels with no real training in how to do it. The result is a workforce expected to lead, network and represent the brand without the connective skills any of that requires. The cost shows up in disengagement, weak internal networks and leaders who cannot translate authority into presence.
Senior teams are being asked to speak with authority on culture, identity and public trust, often in front of audiences who no longer accept a neutral corporate voice. The tension is practical. Leaders need to hold a position on representation and social change without either retreating into compliance language or stepping into territory they cannot defend.
Most organisations treat creativity as a culture problem, then complain that nothing ships. The harder question is operational: how do creative teams stay productive at scale, and how do leaders translate abstract ideas into experiences that actually move people. That gap, between intent and execution, is where most innovation programmes lose the thread.
Organisations invest heavily in understanding technology trends, yet most briefings start with the applications and skip the science behind them. The result is leaders who can name the tool but cannot reason about where it leads. Quantum computing, space-based infrastructure, and AI all rest on physical principles that reward first-principles thinking – and penalise those who lack it.
Most incentive systems reward speed and individual credit: the exact qualities that undermine genuine collaboration. When teams know that recognition goes to whoever announces first, patience and rigour become competitive disadvantages. The organisations that claim to want bold innovation are often the ones that have inadvertently designed against it.
Some shocks rewrite a person’s working life overnight. A violent attack, a serious diagnosis, a sudden loss; the question afterwards is not whether to keep going, but how to lead, work, and decide while still recovering. Organisations rarely have a language for that, and the people inside them rarely have a model to follow.