Organizational Agility

Why organisations work with Polly LaBarre She co-built, with Gary Hamel, the most concrete body of practice on post-bureaucratic management, drawing on case studies from named companies rather than abstract principles. She wrote the bestselling field guide to original organisations, Mavericks at Work, and has spent two decades adding to that evidence base through Fast Company and HBR. She brings a working operator’s view on what actually frees creative capacity inside large firms, sharpened through running the HBR/McKinsey M-Prize and the MIX Mashup. She lands as a journalist first, which means specific stories about specific companies, not slide-deck frameworks recycled from other speakers in the same topic area. Biography highlights Co-author, Mavericks at Work: Why the Most Original Minds in Business Win, named a Book of the Year by The Economist Co-founder, Management Lab, with Gary Hamel and Michele Zanini Co-founder and editorial director, MIX (Management Innovation eXchange), partnered with HBR and Fortune Founding member and senior editor, Fast Company magazine, for eight years Business and innovation correspondent, CNN, with recurring on-air segments on American Morning and Your Money Contributor to Harvard Business Review, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Fortune and McKinsey Quarterly Biography Most companies were engineered for a world that no longer exists. They reward consistency, suppress dissent and treat management as a control function. That mismatch, between how organisations are built and what they now need to do, is the problem Polly LaBarre has been studying, writing about and trying to fix for more than two decades. She was a senior editor and founding team member at Fast Company, the magazine that reframed how a generation of leaders thought about work. With William C. Taylor she wrote Mavericks at Work, a New York Times bestseller that The Economist called a Book of the Year and put alongside In Search of Excellence. The book set out, through detailed company case studies, what it actually takes to compete with originality at scale. That work led directly into the Management Lab, which she co-founded with Gary Hamel and Michele Zanini, and into the MIX (Management Innovation eXchange), the open platform partnered with Harvard Business Review and Fortune and backed by McKinsey, Red Hat and Gartner. Through the HBR/McKinsey M-Prize and the MIX Mashup, she has spent the past decade pulling together a working catalogue of progressive management practice from companies inside the Fortune 500 and well beyond it. Her background as a journalist shows in how she works on stage. She speaks in named cases, names sources and concrete mechanisms, and her writing in HBR, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Fortune and McKinsey Quarterly is the basis for most of what she puts in front of an audience. CNN used her as a business and innovation correspondent for exactly that reason. Key speaking topics Post-bureaucratic management and organisational redesign Resilience and adaptability in large organisations Innovation as a managed discipline Corporate culture and the human edge Talent, autonomy and the future of work Leadership for purpose-driven change Ideal for CEOs, COOs and executive teams confronting the limits of their current operating model CHROs and chief people officers redesigning work and culture for a more capable workforce Heads of innovation, transformation and strategy looking for evidence rather than slogans Boards and leadership offsites wanting a sharp, journalist’s read on what original organisations actually do differently Audience outcomes A clear-eyed picture of why traditional management practices are now a constraint on competitiveness Concrete examples, drawn from named companies, of how organisations have rebuilt for adaptability A working vocabulary for diagnosing where their own management model is leaking energy and initiative A sharper sense of what to change first when the goal is more resilience and originality, not more control

Why organisations work with Maya Townsend She brings organisation network analysis into the room as a working tool, not a slide. Leaders leave knowing which specific people inside their business carry influence that the org chart hides. She has co-edited the OD Network’s Handbook for Strategic HR (AMACOM, 2012), giving her work a peer-reviewed foundation that most change speakers cannot point to. She advises Gartner on change management and organisation network practice, which means her frameworks have been pressure-tested with the analyst body that many of her clients buy research from. She is one of three US-certified Lewis Method of Deep Democracy trainers, so when polarised teams are stuck on a decision she has a specific method for moving them, not a general facilitation style. She works the seam between strategy and adoption. Clients booking her are usually past the point of needing a diagnosis and want someone who can name the next intervention. Biography highlights Founder and lead consultant, Partnering Resources, an organisation development practice focused on networks, collaboration, and change. Co-editor, Handbook for Strategic HR: Best Practices in Organization Development from the OD Network (AMACOM, 2012). Chapter author, “Organization Network Dynamics and Analysis,” in the NTL Handbook of Organization Development and Change. Adviser to Gartner on change management and organisation network practice. Contributor to strategy+business, People + Strategy, Nonprofit Quarterly, CIO, and Inc.com. MS in Organization Development (with distinction), American University / NTL Institute; certified Lewis Method of Deep Democracy trainer, one of three in the United States. Biography Every large organisation has two structures. There is the one on the chart, and there is the network of relationships that actually moves information, decisions, and trust. Townsend’s work starts from the second one. She runs Partnering Resources, the change and organisation development practice she founded, where she uses organisation network analysis to show leaders the brokers, connectors, and quiet experts their formal hierarchy hides. The diagnosis is concrete: specific names, specific gaps, specific places where a transformation is going to fail unless someone intervenes. The intellectual base behind this work is unusually deep for a speaker in her field. She co-edited the OD Network’s Handbook for Strategic HR with AMACOM, contributed the chapter on network dynamics to the NTL Handbook of Organization Development and Change, and writes regularly for strategy+business, People + Strategy, and CIO. Gartner uses her as an adviser on change management and network practice. What that produces in a keynote setting is a practitioner who can move from the science of how organisations actually behave to the next concrete move a leadership team should make on Monday morning. She has presented at Gartner and Inc. 500 or 5000 events, taught networked leadership at Boston University and Northeastern, and is one of three Lewis Method of Deep Democracy trainers certified in the United States, which she draws on when teams are polarised and stuck. Key speaking topics Organisation network analysis Change leadership in complex systems Collaboration across silos and ecosystems Conflict and polarisation in leadership teams Talent and influence mapping Strategy adoption and organisational resilience Ideal for CEOs and transformation leads landing a strategy that depends on cross-functional adoption. Heads of strategy, OD, and change running enterprise change programmes that have stalled at the middle. Senior HR and talent leaders identifying who actually carries influence in a high-potential population. Leadership teams stuck on a polarised decision and looking for a method, not a facilitation pep talk. Audience outcomes A working picture of the informal networks inside their own organisation, and where those networks are blocking or accelerating strategy. Specific moves to identify the brokers and connectors who decide whether a change effort lands. A sharper read on why past change programmes stalled, anchored in network evidence rather than personality. A method for engaging conflict in leadership teams that turns disagreement into a decision rather than a stalemate.