Inteligencia emocional
Oradores que exploran cómo la autoconciencia y la empatía transforman líderes, equipos y organizaciones
Speakers Associates represents 77 speakers on Inteligencia emocional, including Joy Poole, Lauren Ducrey, Gopi Krishnaswamy, Neelu Kaur, Martin Brooks, Nikki Bhamra, Kit Symons & Holly Sedlacek, Paul McGee, Scott Tillema y Mc’Dole Chigborogu.
Most leaders have been trained to negotiate from a position – to trade concessions, protect leverage, and know their walk-away point. That training fails the moment authority disappears, a conversation becomes hostile, or a deal cannot be sweetened with anything tangible. The skill that actually determines outcomes in those moments is not negotiation technique. It is the discipline of listening at a level most professionals never reach.
Senior conferences, awards nights and town halls fail in the same place. The room loses energy when the host cannot hold a panel, draw a candid answer from a guarded executive, or recover when a run sheet breaks. The right host does the opposite, and the evening lands the way it was meant to.
Most leadership failures are not caused by a shortage of information. They are caused by the assumptions that go unchallenged, the questions that don’t get asked, and the signals that go unnoticed because no one in the room felt safe enough to name them. Organisations invest heavily in strategy and execution, but rarely in the quality of the thinking that precedes every decision, and that gap has measurable consequences for performance, risk, and trust.
Wellbeing budgets have grown, but burnout, anxiety and presenteeism have not eased. Most workplace mental health support is too light to help the people who most need it, and too generic to convince a sceptical workforce that the organisation takes the issue seriously. The gap senior leaders feel is between wellness theatre and substantive psychological support that actually changes how people perform.
Trust is the operating currency of every senior negotiation, every restructuring announcement, every difficult board conversation. Most leaders do not know how to read whether they have it, build it, or have just lost it in the room. The cost of that gap shows up in stalled deals, disengaged teams, and decisions made on the wrong nonverbal signal.
Most workforces are not short on strategy. They are short on the personal capacity to keep performing through change, setbacks and rising pressure. When confidence slips and energy drains, the cost shows up as disengagement, attrition and stalled execution long before it shows up in the operating plan.
Senior leaders are promoted for technical results, then judged on how they land a room. Most reach the executive layer without ever being coached on the mechanics of influence, and default to slides, data, and seniority when the moment calls for presence. Boards, clients and regulators read the gap immediately.
Most organisations know their leaders and teams need stronger emotional intelligence but treat it as a soft add-on to “proper” development work. The result is predictable: escalating conflict at the senior level, poor retention of high performers, and change programmes that stall because the people inside them cannot regulate their own reactions under pressure. The gap is not one of concept but of measurement and method.
Senior leaders are judged on composure under load, and most have never been taught the mechanics of it. The pressure shows up in how they hold a board meeting, a pitch, or a difficult conversation, not in their strategy decks. Closing that gap requires specific behavioural craft, not motivation.
Engagement is falling, hybrid teams are fragmenting, and five generations now sit inside the same reporting line. Leaders who built their authority on competence are discovering that competence alone no longer holds a team together. The deficit is relational, and it is showing up in turnover, trust scores and the quiet exit of the people organisations most want to keep.
Most leaders are promoted on technical ability and then asked to do something different: build trust, hold a room, set a culture that survives them. That gap is where engagement collapses and good people leave. Organisations need leaders who can shift their own behaviour fast enough to shift the team’s.
Leadership effectiveness rarely fails for lack of strategy. It fails because senior people lose composure, default to abstraction with their teams, and confuse politeness with care. The harder problem is teaching experienced leaders to make difficult decisions in a way that the organisation will still trust them afterwards.