Innovation & Disruption speakers
Speakers who examine how industries are reshaped — and how organisations can lead rather than follow change
Speakers Associates represents 391 speakers on Innovation & Disruption, including Kemal Apaydin, Michael Lyon, Peter Fisk, Neri Karra Sillaman, Mark Stevenson, Nilofer Merchant, Itai Green, Lucy Bullivant, Rita McGrath and Katja Schipperheijn.
Most organisations now run two AI agendas in parallel and neither one is working. The compliance agenda is ahead of the strategy agenda, and the strategy agenda is ahead of the operating model. Boards need a coherent way to think about AI as economic infrastructure, not as a procurement question, while the technology is still moving faster than their policies, their hiring, and their planning cycles can absorb.
Most large companies still organise around the playbook that built them. The world they compete in now rewards faster cycles, ecosystem partners, and growth engines that sit outside the core. The hard question is no longer whether to transform, but how to run the existing business at full performance while building the next one alongside it.
Most strategic frameworks were built for a more orderly world. Boards are now making capital decisions across climate, geopolitics, technology and the loss of trust in institutions, and these have stopped behaving as separate items on a risk register. The harder problem is no longer choosing the right answer to any one of them, but holding a workable stance when the variables move together and feeding the wrong assumptions into the rest of the strategy carries real cost.
Boards are being asked to make ten-year commitments on technologies that change every six months. Most leadership teams lack a decision architecture for this: they either freeze, or they pilot endlessly without operational deployment. The unresolved question is how to commit capital and reorganise work around AI without betting the firm on a single forecast.
Most consumer research tells leadership teams what people say, not what they do. Brands keep losing share because the data they trust never reaches the actual moment of decision. And the same companies pour budget into transformation programmes that collapse under their own bureaucracy, killing the customer instinct they were built to protect.
Many founder-led companies have a brilliant product and no idea how to take it global without losing what made it work. Scaling kills more good businesses than competition does. The hard part is building the commercial machine around the inventor without smothering the invention.
Most leadership messages get heard, then forgotten by the next meeting. Strategy decks, town halls, brand campaigns and customer pitches compete for attention against everything else employees and buyers see in a day. The discipline of building a story that an audience can repeat, and wants to repeat, is rarely treated as a serious business skill, even as it decides whether a strategy lands or stalls.
Most organisations claim to learn from failure and to value diverse thinking. Few are structured to do either. The cost shows up later, in decisions that everyone agreed with at the time and that no one wants to revisit.
Most brands still treat marketing as broadcast: a message pushed at a customer through paid media. The customer, meanwhile, decides whether to buy on the basis of what the brand actually does to them in the room, in the app, in the stadium, in the store. The gap between what marketing departments produce and what customers experience is where commercial advantage is now lost or won.
Climate, fire and resource pressure are now physical risks to property, supply chains and operating sites, not abstract sustainability commitments. Most boards still treat them as reporting categories rather than design constraints on the buildings, campuses and cities they invest in. The gap between net zero language and how organisations actually build, source and locate is where the real exposure now sits.
Most leadership teams still think about competition the way they think about products: build a better one and customers follow. Platforms break that logic. The harder question is when to compete as a product, when to open an ecosystem, and how to avoid funding rivals you have just enabled.
Industry boundaries are moving faster than strategy teams can redraw them. Software firms, platforms and AI entrants now compete inside sectors that once felt structurally protected, and the rules of value capture have changed with them. Boards keep asking the same question: where in this ecosystem do we still own the customer, and where are we becoming a component in someone else’s stack.