Business Model Innovation
Speakers who challenge how organisations create, deliver, and capture value in shifting markets
Most founders pitch the upside. Few have the discipline to talk honestly about the years between traction and exit, when capital tightens, partnerships stall, and the operating model has to be rebuilt mid-flight. Boards backing entrepreneurial leaders, and corporates trying to learn from them, need someone who has lived the full arc, not just the launch.
A recognisable name is not a business. Converting personal reputation into a product line that holds shelf space, survives pricing pressure, and keeps a consumer coming back is a different discipline from being famous. Most celebrity brands collapse on the second season; the ones that last are built by founders who understand fabric, margin, and distribution as well as they understand audience.
Categories that touch women’s health, hormones, or stigmatised physiology have been chronically underbuilt. Consumer brands and digital health teams keep underestimating the commercial opportunity in markets they personally find awkward to discuss. Building credibly in those spaces requires a founder who has done both: scaled a brand business and raised capital around physiology most boardrooms still avoid.
Most mid-sized European companies have run AI pilots. Few have moved them into operating reality. Boards are stuck between vendor pitches, internal scepticism, and a workforce already split between people who use AI daily and people who don’t.
Leaders keep treating digital as a channel when it is now the substrate of their industry. The pattern is consistent: software, data and networks erode the unit economics of physical products, intermediaries and distribution before the incumbent sees the shift. By the time the financial impact lands, the strategic options have already narrowed.
Most corporate sustainability programmes are eco-efficiency exercises dressed as transformation. They reduce harm at the margin while the underlying business model still depends on extraction, waste, and single-use materials. Leaders increasingly sense the gap between their ESG narrative and the operating reality of their supply chains, and they need a credible framework for what comes next.
Sustainability commitments made at board level rarely survive contact with an Asian supply chain. Traceability, materials, certifications and audit trails sit thousands of miles away from the strategy deck, inside factories the company does not own. Closing that gap is what separates ESG narrative from operating substance.
Most brands have audiences they do not own and emotional equity they cannot monetise. The platforms sit in the middle, the data sits with someone else, and the relationship with the customer is rented rather than built. Turning fan affinity into a direct revenue line, at scale, is one of the harder commercial problems any consumer-facing organisation now faces.
Digital commerce platforms now sit between most consumer-facing companies and their customers. The operating decisions that matter, around discovery, conversion, and cross-border reach, are increasingly shaped by how a handful of global platforms structure attention and demand. Senior leaders need a working view of that landscape from someone who has built inside it, not described it from outside.
Fashion businesses run on a development model that was already strained before AI changed what was possible. A typical garment moves from sketch to production through six to eight weeks of manual pattern work, multiple physical samples, and inventory commitments made months before a customer is asked anything. The operational question is no longer whether to automate. It is whether the leadership team understands which parts of the cycle can now be compressed, what the supply chain looks like when production becomes on-demand, and how to integrate digital and physical product lines without losing brand identity.
Large organisations want the speed and originality of a founder-led startup, but the operating system inside them rewards the opposite behaviours. Boards approve innovation budgets and then watch promising pilots stall in legal, brand and procurement reviews. The harder question is how to design a venture inside a corporate parent so that it survives long enough to learn something useful.
Customer expectations now move faster than most innovation pipelines can absorb. Strategy teams see the shifts in the data, but by the time a proposition reaches market, the reference point has moved again. The real question is not which trend to chase, but how to build a repeatable method for turning early signals into commercial bets that leaders will back.