Formazione e sviluppo speakers
Professionisti che aiutano le organizzazioni a costruire culture dove le competenze crescono continuamente e l’ambizione si realizza attraverso lo sviluppo
Speakers Associates represents 41 speakers on Formazione e sviluppo, including Ruth Gotian, Fiona Passantino, Nick Hutchinson, Nikhil Desai, Dr. Andrew Ng, Juan Campoo, Andy Storch, Christian Byrge, Sasha De Sola, e Harry Ife.
The carbon committed when a building is constructed can exceed its operational footprint over thirty years. Yet most sustainability programmes treat construction materials as outside their mandate. As Scope 3 accounting extends to embodied emissions, the gap between climate commitments and procurement decisions becomes visible – and costly to ignore.
Senior leaders rise through technical and commercial track records, then hit a level where the work is almost entirely relational. Most have no framework for it. They under-use mentors, struggle to ask for help, and treat networks as transactional, which costs them retention, succession depth and personal resilience long before it shows up in results.
Most career development inside large organisations has quietly broken down. Employees expect the company to map their growth, the company expects employees to drive their own, and neither side is honest about the gap. The result is disengagement, attrition among the people most worth keeping, and L&D budgets that produce activity but not ownership.
Most organisations invest heavily in learning and development but see little lasting change in what their people can actually do. The gap between training delivered and capability retained is not a content problem, it is a cognitive one. When the science of how humans encode, practise, and recall information is ignored, even well-designed programmes produce forgetting rather than performance.
Fast-growing companies lose the culture that made them worth joining. Headcount triples, processes fragment, and the behaviours that built the early product quietly disappear into the org chart. Most leadership teams only notice when the customer experience starts to slip.
Most organisations treat creativity as a personality trait of a few staff and a slogan for everyone else. The result is innovation that depends on individual heroics, breaks under pressure, and does not survive restructure. The shift is from creative culture as an atmosphere to creative output as a trainable team capability with measurable behaviours.
Most leadership teams can describe their culture in a slide deck. Few can name the specific behaviours that would tell you, from the outside, whether those values are real. The gap between what organisations say they are and how their people actually behave is ultimately a leadership problem, and closing it takes more than a communications campaign.
Leaders keep asking people to adapt, absorb more information, and perform under pressure without giving them any actual method for doing it. Training budgets get spent on tools and platforms while the underlying human skills – attention, recall, composure in a high-stakes room – are left to chance. The result is a workforce that knows it needs to change but has no practical way to rewire how it learns and performs.
Employee engagement scores have plateaued, recognition programmes feel mechanical, and middle managers are still the single largest reason good people leave. Leadership teams keep investing in culture decks and values statements while the behaviours on the ground stay the same. The gap is between what HR designs and what line managers actually do on a Monday morning.
Most leaders are selected and rewarded for having answers. The pressure to project certainty does not disappear when a challenge is genuinely complex – it intensifies. Most leadership development treats uncertainty as a problem to be managed rather than a condition to be led through. The capability that matters most in those moments is rarely built.
Most organisations say they want curious, engaged employees, then run cultures that punish question-asking and reward execution. The gap shows up as low engagement, slow learning, and innovation initiatives that produce decks instead of decisions. The question for leaders is no longer whether curiosity matters, but what specific organisational behaviours are killing it.
Most organisations have run AI pilots. Few have moved beyond them. The gap is not technological – it is organisational. Building the internal structures, teams, and decision-making capacity to deploy AI at scale is the challenge most leadership teams have not yet solved. Without a systematic approach, AI investments accumulate without compounding.
All speakers on Formazione e sviluppo
- Alex Cicelsky
- Andy Lopata
- Andy Storch
- Barbara Oakley
- Beth Davies
- Christian Byrge
- Clive Woodward
- David Thomas
- Debra Corey
- Diana Renner
- Diane Hamilton
- Dr. Andrew Ng
- Fiona Passantino
- Frederika Roberts
- Fredrik Haren
- Harry Ife
Show all 41 speakers
- Jef Staes
- Juan Campoo
- Mariano Sigman
- Mark Williams
- Matthew Syed
- Miha Pogacnik
- Nicholas Janni
- Nick Hutchinson
- Nikhil Desai
- Peter Senge
- Raven Baxter
- Robert Winston
- Ruth Gotian
- Ruth Hinks
- Sasha De Sola
- Savvas Trichas
- Sebastian Thrun
- Stefaan van Hooydonk
- Steph McGovern
- Steve Wozniak
- Suzannah Baum
- Travis Bradberry
- Vinh Giang
- Vishen Lakhiani
- Will Greenwood