Business Strategy & Growth speakers
Strategists, economists and entrepreneurs who help organisations identify opportunity and execute with conviction
Speakers Associates represents 320 speakers on Business Strategy & Growth, including Kemal Apaydin, Arnt Eriksen, Michael Lyon, Peter Fisk, Neri Karra Sillaman, Mark Ritson, Olivier Sibony, Itai Green, Tom Goodwin and Rita McGrath.
Most organisations can articulate a growth strategy. Far fewer can explain why their business will still be competitive in twenty years. The research on what actually drives longevity – as distinct from short-term performance – points to a set of structural choices that established companies rarely make, because they were never forced to. That gap between building for the next cycle and building for the next generation is one of the most consequential and least examined problems in senior strategy conversations.
Digital transformation programmes still stall in the gap between the boardroom slide and the operating reality. Most leadership teams have the strategy. Few have run the messy work of converting telecoms, media and SaaS businesses from old revenue models into new ones, through acquisitions, restructurings and capital constraints. That is where the value is now decided.
Most organisations describe innovation as a value, then run it as a series of disconnected pilots. The result is activity without compounding advantage, and customer experiences that are designed by accident rather than intent. Boards are now expected to show that innovation produces measurable growth, not slide decks.
Boards are being asked to make irreversible bets on AI, quantum, and biotech without a credible internal voice on where these technologies are actually heading. The instinct is to delegate the question to consultants who repeat last year’s consensus. That leaves the most consequential decisions with leaders who lack the horizon to judge them.
Marketing departments have lost authority inside large organisations at exactly the point when customer behaviour, private label competition, and emerging-market entrants are reshaping commercial advantage. CEOs are asking marketing teams to defend pricing power, build global brands from non-Western origins, and respond to low-cost rivals without the strategic mandate to do so. The question is what marketing actually has to become to earn that mandate back.
Boardrooms are facing harder questions about corporate purpose, ownership, and what the firm is actually for. Activist shareholders push ESG mandates while stakeholder capitalism slogans run ahead of operating reality. Most leadership teams lack a rigorous framework for thinking through ownership and incentive design when no contract can specify every outcome.
Consumer-facing businesses live or die in public. The discipline of running an operation judged in real time by every customer, often inside someone else’s host environment, is harder than strategy decks suggest. And when those operations fail, as they do, the question of what to rebuild on rarely gets answered well.
Boards approve strategies that look rigorous on the deck and fail in the market. The same executives, looking at the same evidence, reach different conclusions on different days, and nobody notices. Most decision processes are built to confirm what senior leaders already believe, not to surface where their judgment is wrong.
Brands win attention by buying it. They win loyalty by earning a place in the culture their customers already live in. Most marketing organisations are structured for the first job and underpowered for the second, which is why category leadership now turns less on media weight than on whether a brand can move at the speed of culture without losing commercial discipline.
Most B2B technology categories sell on specs and miss the buyer entirely. Marketing teams write capability decks while the buyer is making a procurement decision driven by brand trust, narrative clarity and regional cultural fit. The result is investment that lands as noise, not pipeline.
Founders who build a brand on personal taste rarely scale it. The transition from one creator’s instinct to an institution that compounds beyond them is where most heritage names stall. The harder problem still: turning a creative practice into a vehicle for capital, policy, and continental influence.
Most retailers and consumer brands still design stores, formats, and digital journeys around what they think customers do, not what customers actually do. The gap between intent and behaviour at the shelf, the entrance, the checkout, and the screen is where margin leaks and category share moves. Closing that gap requires direct observation of human behaviour in commercial space, not surveys, not focus groups, not dashboards.