Cybersäkerhet
Experter som hjälper organisationer att förstå digitala hot, skydda kritiska system och bygga genuin motståndskraft
Speakers Associates represents 64 speakers on Cybersäkerhet, including Limor Ziv, Harriet Farlow, Saakshar Duggal, Marc Saltzman, Theresa Payton, Jim Sciutto, Susi O’Neill, Georgia Harrison, Nina Schick och Sol Rashidi.
Technology decisions no longer sit inside the technology function. The next decade of corporate strategy will be shaped by state power, capital flows and public backlash as much as by product roadmaps, and leadership teams are being asked to read all of these at once. Most boards can price a competitor. Far fewer can price a government, a regulator and a public mood moving against them at the same time.
Most financial crime training works off case studies written after the fact. It teaches people what fraud looks like from the outside. What it rarely gives them is the working logic of the person on the other side of the transaction. That blind spot is what allows sophisticated scams, mule-account networks and AI-enabled impersonation to keep finding room inside well-resourced institutions.
Most organisations want the upside of AI but cannot share the data that would make their models useful. Regulators, customers, and competitors all push in opposite directions, and the standard answer is to slow down. The harder question is how to use sensitive data across institutional boundaries without giving it up, and that question is now sitting on the desk of every senior leader running an AI programme.
Boards are being asked to deploy AI faster than they can govern it. The question is no longer whether to adopt the technology but how to make decisions about it that hold up under scrutiny from regulators, employees, and the public. Most organisations have no working model for that, only policies that lag the systems they are meant to oversee.
Technology strategies are being made faster than the institutions running them can think. The tools leaders use to understand risk were built for a slower, more legible world. When misinformation, digital conflict, and exponential change operate simultaneously, the primary vulnerability isn’t technological, it’s cognitive.
Most organisations still treat cyber as an IT department problem. The attack surface has moved: it now runs through the personal devices, social profiles, and travel patterns of senior leaders, and through the open-source data their organisations leak every day. Boards need someone who can show them what an adversary actually sees, not another briefing on compliance.
Autonomous systems, from self-driving vehicles to generative AI, are moving from lab to revenue faster than most boards can absorb. The strategic question is no longer whether the technology works. It is which timelines are real, which are marketing, and which regulatory and civil-liberties fights will decide who gets to deploy at scale.
Most security programmes are designed by defenders who have never sat on the attacker side of the screen. That gap shows up in the controls that get prioritised, the scenarios that get war-gamed, and the fraud losses that keep arriving through channels the team believed were covered. Closing it takes an honest account of how criminals actually choose their targets, move money, and defeat the layers a bank or retailer has spent years building.
Most leadership teams treat digital risk as a technical problem they can delegate. The real exposure is power: who controls the information, the platforms, and the narratives that now decide a company’s reputation, a market’s direction, and an election’s outcome. By the time that shift is visible on a balance sheet, the advantage has already moved.
Boards now treat information integrity as an operating risk, not a communications problem. Coordinated manipulation, hostile narratives and regulator pressure arrive on the same week, and most leadership teams do not have a shared language for any of it. The gap sits between the security function that sees the signals and the executives who have to act on them.
Regulators, lawmakers and users have stopped giving technology companies the benefit of the doubt. Privacy, safety and public policy are no longer back-office functions; they shape product, valuation and executive exposure. Most leadership teams are trying to build that capability after the scrutiny has already arrived, not before.
Brands keep losing time and money on social platforms they do not understand. Most marketing teams cannot explain why one TikTok travels and another dies, and they have no working view of the safety and reputational risk that comes with putting a brand in front of a younger audience. The result is either timid content that nobody watches, or noisy content that creates problems nobody saw coming.
All speakers on Cybersäkerhet
- Alec Ross
- Alex Wood
- Andrew Trask
- Audrey Tang
- Ben Hammersley
- Ben Owen
- Brad Templeton
- Brett Johnson
- Carl Miller
- Chloe Colliver
- Chris Kelly
- Clodagh Griffin
- Confidence Staveley
- Dr Julia Ebner
- Dr Stephanie Hare
- Dr. Mark T. Hofmann
Show all 64 speakers
- Eleanor Watson
- Eric O'Neill
- FC
- Garry Kasparov
- Gary Foote
- Georgia Harrison
- Glenn Wilkinson
- Greg Williams
- Harmeen Mehta
- Harriet Farlow
- Hector Monsegur
- James Barrat
- James Lyne
- Jamie Bartlett
- Jay Tuck
- Jenny Radcliffe
- Jim Sciutto
- Joe Toscano
- Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg
- Limor Ziv
- Lisa Ventura MBE FCIIS
- Lt. General H.R. McMaster
- Mara Balestrini
- Marc Saltzman
- Martin Smith
- Misha Glenny
- Monica Verma
- Monique Morrow
- Neira Jones
- Nina Schick
- Phil Osborn
- Philippe Dewost
- Robert Cringely
- Robert Herjavec
- Rod Beckstrom
- Rory Cellan-Jones
- Rory Cormac
- Saakshar Duggal
- Sasha Qadri
- Seyi Akiwowo
- Silvia Leal
- Sol Rashidi
- Susi O’Neill
- Theresa Payton
- Tim Cole
- Tyler Cohen Wood
- Ymir Vigfusson
- Zoe Kleinman