Workforce Transformation

Why organisations work with Dave Coplin His central argument – that the «digital deluge» is not a productivity crisis to be managed but a strategic opportunity to be led – gives boards a reframe that most AI and digital transformation programmes never offer: the question is not adoption, but what kind of organisation you are willing to become. He built that argument from the inside: twelve years at Microsoft UK as the executive responsible for imagining the human future of technology, a vantage point that neither pure academics nor management consultants can replicate. His books Business Reimagined (2013) and The Rise of the Humans (2014, Harriman House) give organisations a specific, portable framework – the choice between efficiency and effectiveness – that leadership teams can apply directly to their own AI strategy decisions. NED board experience at Mitchells & Butlers plc, Vianet Group plc, and the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association means his perspective on digital strategy carries weight at governance level, not just at conference level. His positioning at the intersection of generative AI adoption and organisational performance means he addresses the question executive teams are now actually asking: how do we become more effective through AI, rather than just faster at what we already do? Biography highlights Founder and CEO of The Envisioners, a digital strategy consultancy established in 2017 after a 12-year career at Microsoft UK Former Chief Envisioning Officer at Microsoft UK – a role he created, focused on the future of the human-technology relationship Author of Business Reimagined (2013) and The Rise of the Humans (2014, Harriman House) Independent Non-Executive Director at Mitchells & Butlers plc, Vianet Group plc, and the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association Regular contributor to BBC, The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Times, Channel 4, and CNN on AI, digital transformation, and the future of work Keynote speaker for clients including Microsoft, Barclays, HP, Vodafone, Ernst & Young, Facebook, and Google, as well as the UK and EU Parliaments Biography Technology investment reliably outpaces the organisational willingness to change. That gap – between what digital tools can do and what organisations are willing to become – is where Dave Coplin has built his career, first as Chief Envisioning Officer at Microsoft UK and now as founder of The Envisioners. His book The Rise of the Humans (Harriman House, 2014) sets out the core argument: the digital deluge of data, tools, and competing demands is not something to survive – it is something to harness. The organisations that succeed are those that stop asking how to automate what they already do and start asking how to reinvent what they do entirely. That argument was relevant when the book was written. With generative AI now reshaping every sector, it has become the defining strategic question for boards and leadership teams. Coplin spent twelve years at Microsoft UK before founding The Envisioners in 2017, advising organisations and governments on what technology-led change actually requires of the people leading it. His clients have included Barclays, Vodafone, Ernst & Young, and the UK and EU Parliaments. He serves as an independent non-executive director at Mitchells & Butlers plc and Vianet Group plc, and has held the same role at the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association. He is a regular contributor to the BBC, The Guardian, The Telegraph, and CNN. His first book, Business Reimagined (2013), made the case for collaborative and flexible working as a technology-enabled opportunity rather than a cultural preference. Both books frame the same consistent argument: the human decision about how to relate to technology matters more than the technology itself. Key speaking topics Generative AI and organisational effectiveness Digital transformation strategy The future of work Human-technology relationship AI adoption and workforce change Reimagining how organisations create value Ideal for CIOs, CTOs, and senior technology leaders shaping AI and digital strategy CEOs and executive teams navigating generative AI adoption decisions CHROs and transformation leads managing the human impact of digital change Board members and non-executive directors overseeing digital governance and technology investment Audience outcomes A clear framework for distinguishing between technology-led efficiency and technology-led effectiveness, and why that distinction matters commercially A reframe of generative AI from operational risk to strategic lever – and the conditions under which that reframe becomes actionable Practical perspective on why human agency and organisational culture are the deciding factors in whether digital investment delivers A sharper view of where AI strategies are likely to stall, and what leadership teams can address before they do Confidence to engage with AI at a strategic rather than technical level – including in board and senior leadership conversations

Why organisations work with Sir Christopher Pissarides The Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides model – the standard tool used by central banks and governments to analyse unemployment and wage formation – means his analysis carries a precision and institutional grounding that macroeconomic commentary cannot match. His Pissarides Review into the Future of Work and Wellbeing, a Nuffield Foundation-funded programme conducted with Imperial College London and Warwick Business School, converts macroeconomic research into concrete, evidence-based frameworks for managing workforce disruption from automation. Forty years of advisory work for the World Bank, European Commission, OECD, and Bank of England means audiences receive analysis that has already shaped the policy environment they operate in – not analysis that describes it from the outside. His position as co-developer of the most cited model in labour economics, and former chair of a national economy council during a financial crisis, enables board-level conversations that translate structural theory directly into strategic workforce decisions. His analysis of AI and automation extends the search-frictions framework behind his Nobel Prize – it is not speculative commentary, but a rigorous continuation of four decades of original research applied to a new generation of technological disruption. Biography highlights Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences 2010, jointly with Peter Diamond and Dale Mortensen, for “analysis of markets with search frictions” Regius Professor of Economics, London School of Economics – faculty member since 1976; former Head of the Economics Department Co-developer of the Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides (DMP) model – the standard global tool for analysing unemployment, wage formation, and labour market policy Author of Equilibrium Unemployment Theory (MIT Press) – the standard reference in labour economics Co-Founder and Co-Chair, Institute for the Future of Work (2018); led the Pissarides Review into the Future of Work and Wellbeing, a £1.8m Nuffield Foundation-funded programme with Imperial College London and Warwick Business School Knighted 2013 for services to economics; IZA Prize in Labor Economics 2005; Fellow of the British Academy, Econometric Society, and American Economic Association; adviser to the World Bank, European Commission, OECD, and Bank of England Biography The Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides model is the standard analytical framework for understanding unemployment. Sir Christopher Pissarides co-built it at the London School of Economics, where he has been on the faculty since 1976. He received the 2010 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for the work, jointly with Peter Diamond and Dale Mortensen. The model’s core claim is that labour markets are governed by frictions. Workers and vacancies do not find each other efficiently. Search costs, information gaps, and institutional design create persistent mismatches that no increase in job openings can resolve on its own. This structural view of unemployment is the one that central banks, the World Bank, and the European Commission reach for when they need precision rather than commentary. Pissarides co-founded the Institute for the Future of Work in 2018 and led the Pissarides Review into the Future of Work and Wellbeing, a Nuffield Foundation-funded programme conducted with Imperial College London and Warwick Business School. The Review applies his frictions framework to automation and AI, producing evidence on how technological disruption creates new mismatches and what organisations and governments must do to manage them. His advisory record spans the World Bank, the European Commission, the OECD, and the Bank of England. He chaired the National Economy Council of the Republic of Cyprus during its financial crisis. He is a Fellow of the British Academy, the Econometric Society, and the American Economic Association. For boards and leadership teams working through structural workforce questions, his analysis carries a weight that secondary interpretation of the same data cannot replicate. Key speaking topics Labour market economics and unemployment theory Search frictions and job matching Automation, AI, and the future of work Workforce disruption and structural economic change Employment policy and institutional design Economic growth and structural transformation Worker wellbeing and productivity Ideal for Boards and C-suite leadership navigating long-term workforce and employment strategy Policymakers, finance ministries, and government economic advisers Chief Human Resources Officers and HR leadership teams grappling with automation and structural workforce change Economic and business conferences addressing labour markets, growth, or the workforce consequences of technology Audience outcomes A structural model for why labour markets underperform that goes beyond cyclical explanations Analytical tools for assessing how automation and AI will affect workforce composition in specific sectors or regions A framework for distinguishing cyclical workforce disruption from structural change that requires institutional response Policy context for decisions on hiring, reskilling, and workforce investment Clarity on how technological change distributes economic gains and losses – and what factors determine which outcome prevails

Why organisations work with Carl Frey The 2013 paper Frey co-authored with Michael Osborne – estimating 47% of US jobs at risk from automation – is one of the most cited works in social science of the past two decades, with its methodology adopted by Obama’s Council of Economic Advisors, the World Bank, and the Bank of England. No comparable speaker in this space brings this level of intellectual provenance to the conversation. His concept of the “technology trap” gives boards a precisely named mechanism for diagnosing their own institutional response to AI: the pattern by which efforts to resist short-term disruption deny organisations the long-term gains that technology makes possible. How Progress Ends (Princeton, 2025) addresses the question now at the top of most board agendas – why do some organisations and nations sustain the capacity to benefit from new technology while others stagnate – and gives senior leaders a durable, historically grounded answer rather than a forecast. His analysis is built on 1,000 years of economic history, not current trend extrapolation. That means the framework he offers survives the next wave of AI announcements rather than becoming obsolete with each new model release. Advisory roles with the G20, OECD, European Commission, and OECD Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence mean he brings regulatory and policy intelligence that most academic speakers lack – organisations understand not just the technology but the governance environment forming around it. Biography highlights Dieter Schwarz Associate Professor of AI & Work, Oxford Internet Institute; Fellow of Mansfield College; Director, Future of Work Programme, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford Co-author of “The Future of Employment” (2013, with Michael Osborne) – one of the most cited social science papers of the past two decades; 20,000+ citations on Google Scholar; methodology adopted by Obama’s Council of Economic Advisors, the World Bank, and the Bank of England Author of The Technology Trap (Princeton University Press, 2019) – Financial Times Best Books of the Year; winner of the Richard A. Lester Prize for Outstanding Book in Industrial Relations and Labour Economics (Princeton University) Author of How Progress Ends (Princeton University Press, 2025) – shortlisted for the FT/Schroders Business Book of the Year Award; finalist for the Lionel Gelber Prize Advisor to the G20, OECD, European Commission, and United Nations; former member of the OECD Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence and the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on the New Economic Agenda Ranked in the top 0.5% of economists worldwide by IDEAS/RePEC; contributor to the Financial Times, Wall Street Journal, Foreign Affairs, Scientific American, and The Economist (By Invitation) Biography The paper that put 47% of US jobs at risk of automation – co-authored at Oxford by Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael Osborne in 2013 – reshaped the global policy debate and became one of the most cited works in social science that decade. Obama’s Council of Economic Advisors used its methodology. So did the World Bank and the Bank of England. The Economist later described Frey as an “accidental doom-monger”: his own reading of the evidence was considerably more nuanced than the headlines. That nuance became the subject of his first book. The Technology Trap (Princeton, 2019) – Financial Times Best Book of the Year and winner of Princeton’s Richard A. Lester Prize – argued that the real risk of automation is not that work disappears, but that organisations and governments mismanage the transition. Drawing on the Industrial Revolution and the Computer Revolution, Frey named the failure mode precisely: resistance to short-term disruption, he showed, tends to deny access to the long-term gains. His 2025 book How Progress Ends – shortlisted for the FT/Schroders Business Book of the Year Award – extends the framework to the question now central to board strategy: why do some organisations and nations sustain the capacity to benefit from new technology while others stagnate? Frey’s answer, built from 1,000 years of economic history spanning Song China to the present, identifies the balance between decentralised innovation and the institutional capacity to scale as the deciding factor. As Dieter Schwarz Associate Professor of AI & Work at Oxford’s Internet Institute and Director of the Future of Work Programme at the Oxford Martin School, Frey advises the G20, OECD, European Commission, and United Nations. His analysis appears in the Financial Times, Wall Street Journal, Foreign Affairs, and Scientific American. IDEAS/RePEC ranks him in the top 0.5% of economists worldwide. Key speaking topics Automation, AI, and labour market transformation The technology trap: historical lessons for the age of AI Why progress stalls – and what organisations and nations can do about it Workforce strategy in an era of technological disruption AI, inequality, and the distribution of economic gains Industrial policy and the geopolitics of technological leadership The economics of innovation: decentralisation, scaling, and competitive advantage Ideal for Boards and C-suite leadership teams navigating AI investment decisions and long-term workforce strategy CHROs and transformation leads developing evidence-based frameworks for workforce planning under conditions of technological disruption Policy and public affairs functions in sectors facing direct automation exposure – financial services, professional services, manufacturing Strategy and scenario planning teams in organisations with significant AI or digital transformation programmes Audience outcomes A historically grounded framework for distinguishing automation that displaces workers from technology that expands what workers can do – and why the difference matters for investment decisions A working understanding of the “technology trap” mechanism: how to identify institutional resistance before it becomes strategically costly Concrete criteria for evaluating workforce and AI investment decisions against historical patterns of disruption, transition, and recovery Insight into the macro-economic and geopolitical conditions shaping AI adoption – including what the US-China competition for technological leadership means for business strategy Sharper language and stronger evidence for board-level conversations about AI, workforce, and long-term competitive positioning

Why organisations work with Vivienne Ming Her «Tax on Being Different» framework quantifies – in economic and productivity terms – the cost organisations pay when marginalised workers must expend extra effort just to be assessed as equivalent. This is a measurement argument with commercial implications, not a values one. As Chief Scientist at Gild, she built machine learning models trained on 122 million professionals, making her one of the few people who has directly operationalised predictive AI for talent assessment at scale, outside a purely academic context. She reframes diversity from a compliance question into an optimisation problem: one that can be modelled, measured, and corrected using the same tools organisations already apply to operational decisions. Her research spans workforce, education, and health, giving her an unusually broad evidence base for what actually predicts long-term human capability, and what doesn’t. Published in Nature and Neural Information Processing Systems, and holding academic appointments at UC Berkeley and UCL, her arguments carry institutional credibility that applied consultants and conference speakers typically cannot match. Biography highlights Author of Robot-Proof: When Machines Have All the Answers, Build Better People (Wiley, 2026), which argues that human capital – not AI capability – determines the outcome of human-machine collaboration PhD in Psychology from Carnegie Mellon University; joint postdoctoral fellowship at Stanford University and UC Berkeley’s Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience Former Chief Scientist at Gild, where she built ML models trained on 122 million professionals to assess human capability beyond conventional credentials Founder and Executive Chair of Socos Labs, an independent research institute applying AI and neuroscience to workforce, education, and health challenges Research published in Nature, Neural Information Processing Systems, and Neural Computation Ranked #5 on the Financial Times / OUTstanding list of the world’s top LGBT executives (2017); named BBC 100 Women (2017) and Inc. Magazine’s «10 Women to Watch in Tech» Chair, UC Berkeley Neurotech Collider Hub; Honorary Professor, UCL Global Business School for Health; board member, RFK Human Rights Biography Vivienne Ming built her career on a discomforting empirical observation: the hiring signals organisations treat as reliable – degrees, interview performance, institutional pedigree – do not predict what they claim to predict. She tested this at scale. As Chief Scientist at Gild, she developed machine learning models trained on data from 122 million professionals, looking for what actually distinguishes high performers from credentialled ones. The gap was substantial. Most organisations were optimising for proxies, not capability. That finding runs through everything she has done since. At Socos Labs, the research institute she co-founded with her wife Dr. Norma Ming, she has extended the question into education and health, examining what psychological constructs genuinely predict long-term life outcomes, and publishing that research in Nature and Neural Information Processing Systems. The argument is consistent: measurement systems in organisations are systematically broken, and the cost is borne most heavily by those who don’t fit the template. Her book Robot-Proof: When Machines Have All the Answers, Build Better People (Wiley, 2026) extends that argument into AI, making the case that human capital – not model benchmarks – determines whether human-machine collaboration produces anything beyond substitution. Her «Tax on Being Different» framework gives that cost a number. Drawing on large-scale HR data, it quantifies the additional credential burden that women, people of colour, and LGBTQ+ individuals absorb to be evaluated on equivalent terms. This is not a cultural argument. It is a productivity and innovation argument: one that has been delivered to boards and leadership teams at Google, Deloitte, and Salesforce, and presented at the Royal Society. She holds a PhD in Psychology from Carnegie Mellon University, with joint postdoctoral appointments at Stanford and UC Berkeley. She chairs the UC Berkeley Neurotech Collider Hub, holds an honorary professorship at UCL’s Global Business School for Health, and serves on the board of RFK Human Rights. In 2017, she was ranked #5 on the Financial Times / OUTstanding list of the world’s top LGBT executives. Her research and commentary have been featured in the Financial Times, Business Insider, Fast Company, and CNBC. Key speaking topics AI and predictive modelling of human capability The economics of talent assessment and bias Neuroscience of decision-making in organisations Diversity, inclusion, and the productivity cost of difference Human-machine collective intelligence AI applications in education, health, and workforce development Innovation methodology: solving ill-posed problems Ideal for CHROs and talent acquisition leaders reviewing whether their hiring signals are predictive CEOs and boards integrating AI into people decisions and workforce strategy DEI leaders seeking evidence-based, commercially framed arguments for systemic change Technology and innovation functions examining the limits and applications of AI in human contexts Audience outcomes A quantified, data-grounded understanding of what broken talent systems cost organisations in productivity and innovation A concrete reframe of diversity: not a moral obligation but a measurement and optimisation problem Practical questions to apply to their own hiring, promotion, and development processes Clarity on where AI reliably improves human assessment – and where it perpetuates the biases already embedded in the data A new vocabulary for capability that moves beyond credentials and credentials-adjacent signals

Why organisations work with Alexis Abramson A PhD in Gerontology from USC’s Leonard Davis School combined with 25 years consulting the product and marketing teams of L’Oréal Paris, Marriott, Walmart, and Procter & Gamble. The academic credential and the commercial track record rarely come together in the same person. Direct product build experience, not commentary. She helped launch the AARP Innovation Lab as Entrepreneur-in-Residence, built BMO Private Bank’s enCircle caregiving programme, and developed Century 21’s MatureMoves programme for agents selling into the boomer market. Two decades of quoted commentary in TIME, The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Financial Times, and Entrepreneur, and hundreds of appearances on NBC’s Today, CNN, and MSNBC as the on-air expert on ageing and generational trends. The Emmy and Gracie Awards confirm she can explain a demographic shift in plain English. Ten years as a primary caregiver for her grandmother inform her work on caregiving as a workforce productivity issue. The material lands because she has lived it. Biography highlights PhD in Gerontology, University of Southern California’s Leonard Davis School of Gerontology Former AARP Entrepreneur-in-Residence; led the launch of the AARP Innovation Lab Developed BMO Private Bank’s enCircle caregiving programme, Century 21’s MatureMoves programme, and Delta Airlines’ mature-adult frequent flyer programme Consulted for L’Oréal Paris, Walmart, Marriott, Comcast, Northwestern Mutual, Procter & Gamble, Kimberly-Clark, Philips, Humana, Ameriprise, and Harvard University Featured in TIME, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal, Entrepreneur, Financial Times, and People; on-air expert for NBC’s Today, CNN, CBS, FOX, and MSNBC Emmy and Gracie Award-winning broadcast journalist Author of The Ultimate Longevity Guide, The Ultimate Caregiver, The 55+ Fact Book, STOP FRAUD, and Home Safety for Seniors Biography The 50+ consumer market is now the largest block of discretionary spending in most developed economies, and brands still misread it. Marketing teams design for a demographic that has not existed since the early 2000s. Product teams assume needs that never land. This is the territory Alexis Abramson has worked inside for 25 years. She trained first as a gerontologist at the University of Southern California’s Leonard Davis School, then moved into commercial consulting. Her client list includes L’Oréal Paris, Walmart, Marriott, Procter & Gamble, Kimberly-Clark, Comcast, and Northwestern Mutual. Her work is concrete. As AARP’s Entrepreneur-in-Residence she played a leading role in the launch of the AARP Innovation Lab. She built BMO Private Bank’s enCircle caregiving programme and developed Century 21’s MatureMoves programme for agents selling into the boomer market. She also shaped Delta Airlines’ frequent flyer programme for mature adults. Each required translating demographic research into a product a real customer would use. She is also the author of The Ultimate Longevity Guide, The Ultimate Caregiver, and STOP FRAUD, and an Emmy and Gracie Award-winning broadcast journalist. Hundreds of appearances on NBC’s Today, CNN, and MSNBC have built a skill most academics never develop. She can explain a demographic shift in two sentences an executive team actually remembers. Key speaking topics The longevity economy and 50+ consumer behaviour Multigenerational workforce dynamics Generational marketing strategy Product and service design for ageing populations Caregiving as a workforce productivity issue Demographic change as commercial opportunity Ideal for Marketing and brand leaders responsible for growth in mature or multigenerational consumer segments Chief Product Officers and product strategy teams designing for the 50+ market CHROs and people leaders running workforces with four or five generations in the room Board and C-suite teams setting strategy against long-horizon demographic change Audience outcomes A sharper read on where the 50+ consumer is actually spending, and where brands are consistently losing the sale Concrete examples of age-inclusive product and marketing design, drawn from her work with named brands A realistic view of caregiving as a workforce productivity issue with direct cost implications A framework for making the five-generation workforce a source of commercial advantage

Why organisations work with Andrew Scott His published distinction between an “ageing society” and a “longevity society”, developed in The Lancet Healthy Longevity and across his books, gives leadership teams a concrete alternative to deficit-focused demographic thinking, with direct implications for workforce design, business model adaptation, and long-term investment. His two books, The 100-Year Life (over one million copies sold) and The Longevity Imperative (2024, shortlisted for the FT–Schroders Business Book of the Year), translate macroeconomic and health research into specific decisions organisations face: how to structure careers, what skills to invest in, how to redesign pension and benefits frameworks. His academic research, including a paper in Nature Aging co-authored with David Sinclair and Martin Ellison, connects macro-economic strategy to the science of ageing itself, giving organisations a basis for anticipating how advances in health and geroscience will affect labour supply and workforce composition over the next two decades. As leader of the CEPR Research Policy Network on the Economics of Longevity and Ageing, he has an overall view of policy, academic research, and applied economic intelligence: not a commentator on the trend, but one of the people who defines the research agenda. His advisory roles at the UK Office for Budget Responsibility, and his prior work with HM Treasury and the Bank of England, mean he can brief boards on the regulatory and fiscal changes that longevity economics will drive – before those changes arrive on the agenda. Biography highlights Professor of Economics at London Business School; Principal Scientist (Economics) at the Ellison Institute of Technology, Oxford CBE, 2026 New Year’s Honours – for services to economics, research and public discourse Co-author of The 100-Year Life (with Lynda Gratton) – over one million copies sold; runner-up for the FT/McKinsey Business Book of the Year Award Author of The Longevity Imperative (2024) – shortlisted for the FT–Schroders Business Book of the Year; named one of the FT’s best summer economics reads Research Fellow, Centre for Economic Policy Research; leads the CEPR Research Policy Network on the Economics of Longevity and Ageing; member of the WEF Global Future Council on Healthy Ageing and Longevity Former Non-Executive Director, UK Financial Services Authority; former Managing Editor, Royal Economic Society’s Economic Journal; advisory board member, UK Office for Budget Responsibility; adviser to HM Treasury and the Bank of England Biography The 100-Year Life, co-authored by Andrew Scott and Lynda Gratton, has sold over a million copies. What made it resonate was not the data on life expectancy; it was the argument that longer lives require a fundamentally different structure for careers, organisations, and economic systems. That argument sits at the centre of Scott’s research at London Business School and the Ellison Institute of Technology in Oxford. Scott’s central distinction – between an “ageing society” and a “longevity society” – reframes longevity from a background risk into a strategic imperative. An ageing society focuses on supporting rising numbers of older people. The longevity society, as Scott defines it in The Lancet Healthy Longevity, demands that organisations prepare for fifty-year careers, not just older employees. The implication for workforce strategy, benefits design, and long-term investment is structural, not cosmetic. The Longevity Imperative (2024, shortlisted for the FT–Schroders Business Book of the Year) extends the analysis from individual careers into system-level change: health systems, fiscal policy, financial markets. Academic research published in Nature Aging with David Sinclair and Martin Ellison grounds this macro-economic framing in the science of ageing itself – connecting what medical advances mean for labour supply to decisions boards face today. Scott advises the UK Office for Budget Responsibility and has previously advised HM Treasury and the Bank of England. He co-founded The Longevity Forum and serves on the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on Healthy Ageing and Longevity. In 2026, he was appointed CBE for services to economics, research and public discourse. Key speaking topics Economics of longevity Demographic change and long-term economic growth Multigenerational workforce design Career reinvention and the 50-year working life Health, ageing, and the economics of prevention Fiscal sustainability and pension system reform AI, technology, and demographic change Business strategy and long-run demographic risk Ideal for CHROs and heads of people strategy at large, multigenerational organisations navigating career architecture and workforce planning for longer working lives Boards and senior leadership teams integrating demographic risk into long-term strategy alongside AI and geopolitical disruption Financial services leaders – asset managers, pension funds, insurers – whose business models are directly shaped by the structural economics of ageing populations Policymakers and public sector leaders with responsibility for labour market, health, or fiscal policy Audience outcomes A concrete framework – the ageing society vs longevity society distinction – for identifying where current workforce and business strategies are misaligned with demographic reality Clarity on the three-dimensional longevity dividend: what it means in practice to build for lives that are longer, healthier, and economically productive Specific implications for pension design, benefit frameworks, talent investment, and career architecture – not trend-watching, but decision-relevant analysis An evidence-based view of how advances in geroscience and health technology are likely to affect labour supply and workforce composition over the next two decades A new strategic vocabulary for the board conversation on longevity – one that moves from “ageing burden” to a concrete set of opportunities and organisational decisions

Why organisations work with Tammy Erickson A trilogy of Harvard Business Review Press books on Boomers, Gen X and Gen Y built on primary research, not commentary, giving leaders a defensible base for talent and engagement decisions. A McKinsey Award-winning HBR article (“It’s Time to Retire Retirement”) that reframed how Fortune 500 employers think about late-career workers, still cited in CHRO conversations. Five appearances on the Thinkers50 ranking, evidence that her ideas have stayed relevant across more than a decade of workforce change. Operating credibility from board seats at PerkinElmer and Allergan, plus client work with General Electric, Bank of America and Novartis, so the workforce arguments land with senior commercial leaders, not just HR. Co-direction of London Business School’s “Leading Businesses into the Future” programme, which keeps her arguments calibrated to current senior-executive challenges rather than past research. Biography highlights Adjunct Professor of Organisational Behaviour, London Business School; co-director of the “Leading Businesses into the Future” programme. Founder and CEO of Tammy Erickson Associates, a workforce and engagement advisory firm. McKinsey Award winner, Harvard Business Review, for “It’s Time to Retire Retirement.” Author of the HBR Press generational trilogy: “Retire Retirement,” “Plugged In,” and “What’s Next, Gen X?” Co-author of “Workforce Crisis” (Harvard Business School Press) and “Third Generation R&D.” Former director of Fortune 500 corporations PerkinElmer and Allergan. Ranked on Thinkers50 five times, including 2011, 2013, 2015 and 2017. Biography Most workforce strategies still treat the employee base as one undifferentiated group with a single set of motivations. That worked when one or two cohorts dominated the org chart. It does not work now, with Boomers, Gen X, Millennials and Gen Z sharing teams and reporting lines, each carrying different assumptions about authority, loyalty and what work is for. Erickson built her career on closing that gap. Her Harvard Business Review article “It’s Time to Retire Retirement” won the McKinsey Award and reframed how large employers thought about late-career talent. The argument was not nostalgic or motivational. It was an operating case for redesigning roles, hours and contracts to retain expertise that the demographics said would otherwise walk out. The HBR Press trilogy that followed, “Retire Retirement,” “Plugged In” and “What’s Next, Gen X?,” gave leaders something most generational commentary lacks: a research base built cohort by cohort, with practical implications for engagement, team design and career architecture. Her companion book “Workforce Crisis,” with Ken Dychtwald and Bob Morison, set the broader demographic context. “Leading Across the Ages” was named a Harvard Business Review Breakthrough Idea of 2008. That research sits on top of a working role at London Business School, where she co-directs “Leading Businesses into the Future,” and a track record of Fortune 500 board service at PerkinElmer and Allergan. The result is a voice on workforce questions that boards and executive teams take seriously, because it carries both the scholarship and the operating context. Key speaking topics Multi-generational workforce strategy Employee engagement and the changing employer-employee contract Workforce planning and talent shortage Collaboration in complex organisations Innovation in the intelligent economy Twenty-first century organisational design Future of work and changing assumptions about careers Ideal for CHROs and chief people officers redesigning engagement and retention strategy Boards and executive teams setting talent and workforce policy Heads of organisational development and learning leading multi-generational team programmes Leadership development faculty and HR conferences Audience outcomes A clearer read of how each generational cohort actually behaves inside organisations, beyond the stereotypes Specific implications for talent retention, engagement and team design across cohorts A reframed view of late-career workers as a retention and capacity question, not a cost question An organising frame for redesigning roles, hours and contracts to fit a five-generation workforce Vocabulary senior leaders can use in board and executive conversations on workforce strategy

Why organisations work with Lynda Gratton A research base CHROs cannot replicate in-house: the Future of Work Research Consortium has run for over a decade with executives from more than 60 companies, generating comparative evidence on what is actually working in hybrid, skills and workforce design. Co-author of The 100-Year Life with economist Andrew Scott, the book that reframed longevity as a workforce and strategy issue and was shortlisted for the FT Business Book of the Year. Practical playbook for hybrid: her HBR cover piece How to Do Hybrid Right and Redesigning Work give leadership teams a four-lens method (jobs, employee preferences, projects, inclusion) rather than a slogan. Policy-grade credibility: co-chair of the WEF Global Future Council on Work, Wages and Job Creation, and adviser to the Japanese Prime Minister’s council on a 100-year-life society. Thinkers50 Hall of Fame member, which signals to a board that the perspective in the room has been independently judged against a global field over more than a decade. Biography highlights Professor of Management Practice in Organisational Behaviour, London Business School. Founder of HSM Advisory and the Future of Work Research Consortium, working with executives from more than 60 companies. Author and co-author of ten books, including The 100-Year Life (with Andrew Scott), Redesigning Work, The Shift, Glow and Hot Spots. Thinkers50 Hall of Fame inductee; long-running presence in the Thinkers50 ranking since 2011. Co-chair, WEF Global Future Council on Work, Wages and Job Creation; former chair of the WEF Council on Leadership. Regular contributor to Harvard Business Review, MIT Sloan Management Review, Financial Times and The Times. Biography Most large organisations are running 2025 strategies on a workforce model designed for 2015. Roles, careers and contracts assumed predictable lifespans, fixed locations and a clear line between work and the rest of life. None of those assumptions hold, and the cost of pretending they do shows up in attrition, productivity disputes and stalled transformation programmes. This is the territory Lynda Gratton has worked in for more than two decades from London Business School, where she is Professor of Management Practice in Organisational Behaviour. Through HSM Advisory and the Future of Work Research Consortium she founded in 2009, she has built a continuous comparative dataset on how more than sixty global companies are redesigning jobs, hybrid arrangements and skills, and what separates the redesigns that hold from the ones that quietly revert. Her books anchor the argument. The 100-Year Life, written with economist Andrew Scott, became a bestseller in Japan and was shortlisted for the FT Business Book of the Year, reframing longevity as a strategic issue for governments and employers, not a personal finance question. Redesigning Work translates the same rigour into a four-lens method for hybrid: jobs and tasks, employee preferences, projects and workflows, inclusion and fairness. Her Harvard Business Review cover piece How to Do Hybrid Right and her ongoing MIT Sloan Management Review column put that method into the hands of operators. Boards engage her when they need to move past slogan-level answers on hybrid, skills and longevity. Her co-chairmanship of the WEF Global Future Council on Work, Wages and Job Creation, and her advisory work with the Japanese Prime Minister’s office on a 100-year-life society, are evidence that the same frameworks travel from a single CHRO conversation to national policy. Key speaking topics Future of work and hybrid organisational design Redesigning jobs, careers and skills for longer working lives The 100-year life and longevity as a workforce strategy Workforce transformation in large, complex organisations Hybrid work productivity, fairness and inclusion Leadership in the post-pandemic operating model Talent, retention and the changing employee contract Ideal for CHROs and chief people officers leading hybrid, skills and workforce redesigns. CEOs and executive committees stress-testing their operating model against longer careers and tighter talent markets. Boards and remuneration committees confronting longevity, retention and multi-generational workforce questions. Government, public-sector and policy audiences working on labour market and ageing-society agendas. Audience outcomes A clear method for redesigning hybrid work across jobs, employee preferences, projects and inclusion, drawn from her HBR and MIT Sloan research. A sharper read on what longevity does to careers, learning and talent pipelines, grounded in The 100-Year Life evidence base. Comparative benchmarks from the Future of Work Consortium on what more than sixty global companies are doing on hybrid, skills and workforce design. A board-ready language for distinguishing surface adjustments from genuine workforce redesign. Concrete prompts for the next ninety days of CHRO and ExCo workforce decisions.