Analisi dei dati
Relatori che trasformano dati complessi in strategie chiare, aiutando le organizzazioni a decidere sulla base di evidenze anziché istinto
Speakers Associates represents 52 speakers on Analisi dei dati, including Limor Ziv, Daniel Trabucchi & Tommaso Buganza, Dr Sidney Shapiro, Theresa Payton, Dr Karen Nelson-Field PhD, Timandra Harkness, Karen Eber, Kieran Gilmurray, Joerg Niessing, e Didem Ün Ateş.
Most large organisations have spent heavily on AI and data without seeing the commercial return promised in the business case. Boards want a clearer answer on where AI actually earns its keep, how to govern it as regulators circle, and how to build the internal capability to use it at scale. The gap is rarely the technology. It is the operating model, the talent and the willingness of senior leaders to make specific bets.
Leadership teams are making consequential AI decisions with tools they do not fully understand, on timelines that do not allow for reflection. The hard question is not which model to deploy. It is how to read the cultural and behavioural effects of AI inside the organisation before they calcify into strategy.
Most organizations are running AI somewhere. Getting it to run everywhere, consistently, strategically, at scale, is where senior leadership investment consistently stalls. The gap between a working pilot and an embedded enterprise capability is not a technology gap. It is a strategic and structural one: the wrong organizational design, insufficient data foundations, and a leadership layer that cannot distinguish between AI as a point tool and AI as a new operating logic.
Most investment decisions in large organisations still rely on conviction, narrative, and individual judgement. The cost of that habit shows up in inconsistent returns, hidden risk concentrations, and strategies that cannot be repeated when the person leaves the room. The hard question is what it actually takes to run capital, or any high-stakes commercial decision, on systematic rules rather than gut.
Most organisations want the upside of AI but cannot share the data that would make their models useful. Regulators, customers, and competitors all push in opposite directions, and the standard answer is to slow down. The harder question is how to use sensitive data across institutional boundaries without giving it up, and that question is now sitting on the desk of every senior leader running an AI programme.
Most organisations overestimate risk in markets they do not understand and underestimate opportunity in ones they have already written off. The problem is not missing data – experienced leaders tend to hold shared, systematically incorrect assumptions about how the world has developed. When those assumptions go unexamined in strategy sessions, they shape investment, market entry, and risk decisions in ways that better analysis alone cannot fix.
Most IoT and digital innovation projects run out of budget before they create value, and the reasons are rarely technical. They are structural. One function owns the work while others join too late, and the partner ecosystem needed to scale sits outside the room.
Most marketing organisations collect more data than they act on and run more campaigns than they can defend. The gap between dashboards and decisions has widened with generative AI, not closed. Senior leaders need a way to connect customer intent, measurement and commercial outcomes without handing the argument to the loudest vendor in the room.
Most leadership teams have formally committed to AI and data as strategic priorities. The harder problem is what comes next. Boards and executive committees that cannot interrogate vendor claims, distinguish genuine capability from hype, or set coherent data governance policy become dependent on specialists whose priorities may not align with theirs. Strategic intent without strategic fluency produces expensive, poorly governed technology programmes – and the gap is widening faster than internal capability is growing.
Organisations invest heavily in understanding technology trends, yet most briefings start with the applications and skip the science behind them. The result is leaders who can name the tool but cannot reason about where it leads. Quantum computing, space-based infrastructure, and AI all rest on physical principles that reward first-principles thinking – and penalise those who lack it.
Most executives have mapped their AI technology landscape; far fewer have mapped the governance architecture being built around it. The EU AI Act now sets binding constraints on which AI applications can be deployed, which require conformity assessments, and which are prohibited entirely. Parallel frameworks at UN level will extend these obligations globally.
Most organisations make product, workforce, and policy decisions on data that under-represents half their market. The gap is structural, not incidental, and it shows up in safety failures, missed customers, and AI systems that inherit the bias of their training sets. Leaders who suspect this is happening rarely have a defensible way to find it, fix it, or explain it to a board.
All speakers on Analisi dei dati
- Adrian Joseph
- Ali Rebaie
- Amit Joshi
- Andreas Clenow
- Andrew Trask
- Anna Rosling Rönnlund
- Anne Hoyer
- Avinash Kaushik
- Bernard Marr
- Brian Cox
- Carme Artigas
- Caroline Criado-Perez
- Cassie Kozyrkov
- Christian Howes
- Daniel Trabucchi & Tommaso Buganza
- David McCandless
Show all 52 speakers
- David Spiegelhalter
- Didem Ün Ateş
- Dr Karen Nelson-Field PhD
- Dr Robert Smith
- Dr Sidney Shapiro
- Gary Foote
- Hannah Fry
- Harmeen Mehta
- James Hardy
- Joerg Niessing
- John Ellis
- Jonathan Reichental
- Karen Eber
- Karun Chandhok
- Kieran Gilmurray
- Les Binet
- Limor Ziv
- Mara Balestrini
- Mike Saunders
- Miloš Maričić
- Misiek Piskorski
- Neil Martin
- Paddy Lowe
- Peter Field
- Raffaello D'Andrea
- Rasmus Ankersen
- Sabrina Faramarzi
- Sandra Wachter
- Sol Rashidi
- Theresa Payton
- Tim Harford
- Tim Ringo
- Timandra Harkness
- Ting Li
- Viktor Mayer-Schonberger
- Vivienne Ming