Mental Health in the Workplace speakers
Speakers who tackle stigma, build resilience, and reshape how organisations support employee mental health
Speakers Associates represents 212 speakers on Mental Health in the Workplace, including Clare Kenny, Thimon de Jong, Helen Lawal, James Haskell, Ben McBean, Ben Campagna, Sylvia Marusyk, Dan Edwards, Perri Shakes-Drayton and Toby Makoyawo.
Wellbeing budgets keep rising while engagement, mental health and sustained performance keep deteriorating. Most internal programmes deliver one-off content and produce no behaviour change. The harder question is what actually moves an employee population from short-term motivation to durable performance habits, and who is credible enough to lead that conversation across an entire workforce.
Wellbeing budgets keep rising while burnout gets worse. Organisations add wellbeing apps and resilience workshops, yet employees report feeling more depleted than before. The prevailing approach treats health as one more performance target to optimise, which quietly adds to the pressure it was meant to relieve.
Sexual harassment prevention has hardened into compliance training that employees sit through and forget. Workforce campaigns for inclusion now compete with fatigue and political backlash, and most internal voices have lost the credibility to move the room. Leaders need outside material that survives a cynical audience and still changes how colleagues behave the next day.
Performing in public, week after week, under cameras and judgement, is its own discipline. Most senior leaders inherit some version of it: a board, a market, a press cycle that does not pause for a bad week. The question is how to keep delivering at standard when the audience is permanent and the personal cost is real.
Workforces are tired, distracted and disengaged, and the leaders running them are running on the same fumes. Wellbeing programmes have multiplied without changing how people actually feel about their work or themselves. The question senior teams now face is more honest: what would it take to rebuild the daily conditions under which good work, and good people, are still possible.
When markets move, central banks act or a corporate institution comes under scrutiny, most leadership teams are entirely dependent on how journalists frame events – with little insight into the gap between what is actually happening and what gets reported. At the same time, the economics of any major decision – rates, inflation, sector stress, geopolitical pressure on supply and capital – are growing more complex, more politically charged, and harder to read from the outside. The question is not simply what is happening, but who is shaping the narrative, how, and what that means for decisions made in the boardroom.
Sustained operational pressure wears people down in ways that quarterly engagement surveys do not capture. Wellbeing budgets keep climbing, yet frontline and operational staff often find the programmes generic and disconnected from what their working days actually contain. Credible voices on resilience in those environments are rare, and they are seldom in the room when the strategy gets written.
Senior teams are asked to talk openly about mental health, domestic abuse, exploitation in supply chains and the welfare of younger workers, and most of them do it badly. The language is corporate, the staging is safe, and the people most affected rarely recognise themselves in it. What organisations need is a voice that can hold those subjects on a stage without flattening them.
Engagement scores are flat, change fatigue is high, and most behaviour-change programmes feel like compliance theatre by the second module. Senior teams know the language of culture but cannot get traction on the daily behaviours that decide whether people commit to the organisation or quietly check out. The gap is not insight. It is delivery that adults actually want to participate in.
Senior leaders make their worst decisions when their emotional brain is in charge and they cannot tell. The cost shows up as snap reactions in board meetings, avoidable conflict on executive teams, and quiet attrition from people who never recover from a single high-pressure period. Most corporate wellbeing programmes do not address this; they manage the symptoms after the damage is done.
Senior teams are running on depleted attention, fragmented sleep, and chronic stress, and treating it as an HR problem. The cost shows up in slower decisions, weaker judgement, and unwell people, not in a wellbeing dashboard. Most corporate responses to this still rest on intuition rather than what neuroscience can now measure about the working brain.
Senior leaders are being asked to deliver under conditions that erode the capacity required to deliver. Cognitive load, decision volume, and chronic uncertainty have become the steady state, not the exception. The unresolved question is whether the operating discipline that keeps leaders clear, recovered, and capable belongs in HR as a wellbeing benefit, or inside leadership development as performance infrastructure.