Sales & Customer Acquisition speakers
Practitioners who turn sharper pipeline thinking, modern buyer behaviour and commercial discipline into sustained revenue growth
Speakers Associates represents 80 speakers on Sales & Customer Acquisition, including Mark Ritson, Lilah Jones, Rich Mulholland, Martin Brooks, Charlie Whyman, Thomas Erikson, Patrick Renvoise, David Avrin, Donald Miller and Rachel Sheerin.
Marketing decisions are still made on what customers say they want, not what they actually do. The gap between stated preference and behaviour is where most campaign budgets quietly underperform. Closing it requires evidence from psychology and field testing, not another round of focus groups.
Organisations invest heavily in what they communicate – the argument, the offer, the framing – and almost nothing in the conditions that determine whether it lands. The decision is often made before the message arrives. Most commercial and leadership teams have no systematic approach to the moments that precede persuasion, which means even well-constructed communication is routinely working against itself.
Most senior leaders run businesses someone else built. The instincts that close a hard deal or pull a team out of a missed quarter get diluted as organisations scale. Senior teams need a credible operator who has built from nothing and has the documented exits to prove it.
Customer behaviour rarely follows the logic that marketing plans assume. Small points of friction quietly suppress conversion, loyalty, and adoption while leadership chases bigger strategic levers. The harder question is which behavioural mechanics actually move buyers, and which spend is theatre.
Senior leaders are asked to hold composure, persuade boards, and protect relationships through restructures, contested decisions, and difficult conversations. Most are technically strong but communicate from habit, not intent, and the cost shows up in lost trust, stalled deals, and disengaged teams. The gap between what a leader says and what their team actually hears is rarely diagnosed before it becomes a retention or revenue problem.
Most sales organisations still treat brand, content, and pipeline as separate functions managed by separate teams. The result is paid acquisition that gets more expensive every quarter and a sales force that depends on it. The harder question is what a commercial operating model looks like when the content engine is the lead engine.
Most brands and most professionals are not boring. They are forgettable, which is worse. The question is not how to add more messaging into a saturated market, but how to identify the specific traits that make a company, a product, or a senior leader the one buyers actually choose to remember and recommend.
Most marketing budgets are run as a performance machine that can be measured, with brand work tolerated as overhead. When growth slows, the brand half is cut first and the performance half stops working. Leaders need to defend why both layers exist, on grounds a CFO will accept.
Senior leaders are read before they are heard. A board pitch, a town hall, a negotiation across the table, each turns on micro-signals that the speaker rarely controls and the audience rarely articulates. Most leadership development sidesteps this surface, training argument and strategy while leaving the channel that actually carries them unexamined.
Senior teams know how to plan for growth. They are far less practised at holding their nerve when the plan breaks. The harder question for most leadership groups is not strategy under stability, it is composure under shock, and what happens to performance when individuals are asked to recover, decide and lead while the ground is still moving.
Senior leaders make calls under pressure, with incomplete information, where the wrong choice has consequences within days. Most of what they have been taught about decision-making was built for textbook conditions where the variables are knowable. The skills that actually hold up, reading people accurately and choosing when to commit, are usually picked up by accident.
Most leaders are operating with inherited assumptions about what persuades people, what builds lasting professional influence, and what actually separates executives who reach the top from those who plateau – and the empirical evidence consistently contradicts those assumptions. Negotiation training defaults to rational-actor models that perform poorly under pressure; leadership development programmes chase credentials and charisma while overlooking the four behaviours that large-scale CEO data shows actually predict success. The result is that organisations invest heavily in influence and leadership capability while working from frameworks that the evidence has already disproved.